Petitioner salmon sushi Corp sought a writ of mandate to vacate the decision of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco (California), which sustained demurrers without

Defendant State Board of Equalization sought review of an order from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco (California), which entered judgment in favor of plaintiff

Appellant client moved to strike respondent law firm’s second amended cross-complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). The Orange County Superior Court, California, denied the client’s anti-SLAPP motion,

Plaintiff injured individual sought review of a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which dismissed claims as to defendant attorney in an action against several defendants

Appellant franchisee sought review of a judgment from the Superior Court of Tulare County (California), which granted respondent franchiser’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in appellant’s action for breach

Plaintiff individual brought a putative class action against defendant pharmaceutical companies in state court, alleging a fraudulent marketing and sales scheme to increase the sales of a prescription drug. The

HOLDINGS: [1]-Former employee’s pleading of her Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq., claim in her class action complaint alleging wage and hour

Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that would have prohibited defendants from using plaintiff’s trade name

HOLDINGS: [1]-California’s Broughton-Cruz rule was preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C.S. § 1 et seq., in light of Concepcion, because, although the Broughton-Cruz doctrine was based on

The events like super bowl earn billions of dollars in many ways. There is a big impact of games and tournaments on the economy of any country in which they